Evaluasi Kinerja Guru dalam Perspektif Manajemen Pendidikan: Kajian Literatur Berbasis Evidence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63866/pendiri.v2i2.89Keywords:
Evaluasi Kinerja Guru, Manajemen Pendidikan, Refleksi Profesional, Mutu PembelajaranAbstract
Evaluasi kinerja guru merupakan komponen krusial dalam manajemen pendidikan yang berperan strategis dalam menjamin mutu pembelajaran dan pencapaian tujuan institusi. Artikel ini menyajikan kajian literatur berbasis evidence terhadap pendekatan, indikator, tantangan, dan dampak evaluasi kinerja guru dalam konteks manajemen pendidikan. Metode yang digunakan adalah tinjauan literatur sistematis terhadap 35 artikel ilmiah nasional dan internasional terbitan 2013–2024. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa model evaluasi berbasis kompetensi dan 360-degree feedback menjadi pendekatan yang paling banyak diadopsi. Indikator yang digunakan umumnya mencakup kompetensi pedagogik, profesional, sosial, dan kepribadian, dengan instrumen seperti observasi kelas, portofolio, dan survei stakeholder. Tantangan utama meliputi keterbatasan kompetensi evaluator, resistensi guru, serta kurangnya dukungan teknologi. Evaluasi yang dilakukan secara reflektif, kolaboratif, dan berbasis data terbukti lebih efektif dalam meningkatkan profesionalisme guru dan mutu pembelajaran. Kajian ini merekomendasikan integrasi teknologi dalam sistem evaluasi serta penguatan kapasitas manajerial kepala sekolah guna menjadikan evaluasi lebih bermakna dan transformatif.
Downloads
References
[1] Eka Julia Putri, Marhatul Fatwa, Nurul Anjani Daulay, and M. Abdillah Khairi, “Evaluasi Penilaian Kinerja Guru Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran,” J. Creat. Student Res., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 119–130, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.55606/jcsr-politama.v2i6.4610.
[2] J. H. Stronge, “Teacher Evaluation and School Improvement: Improving the Educational Landscape1,” in Evaluating Teaching, 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2006, pp. 2–24. doi: 10.4135/9781412990202.d4.
[3] M. R. D. P. Molina Valdéz, “Influencia de la evaluación del desempeño docente en la efectividad de la gestíon pública educativa,” Cienc. Lat. Rev. Científica Multidiscip., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1704–1722, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.37811/cl_rcm.v6i5.3187.
[4] I. Tabroni, A. H. Maryani, and R. P. Sari, “Teacher Performance Improvement In Building Quality Education,” Al-Abshar J. Islam. Educ. Manag., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–16, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.58223/al-abshar.v1i1.6.
[5] L. I. Ahmad, “KONSEP PENILAIAN KINERJA GURU DAN FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHINYA,” Idaarah J. Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 1, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.24252/idaarah.v1i1.4133.
[6] A. Permana, “PENILAIAN KINERJA GURU (PKG) DALAM MENINGKATKAN MUTU GURU,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. dan Keislam., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 89–92, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.55883/jipkis.v2i2.29.
[7] K. N. Kusanagi, “Teacher Professional Development in Indonesia: Issues and Challenges,” 2022, pp. 67–80. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-5928-8_4.
[8] E. Usman, M. S. Hakim Irwanto, H. S. Zainiyati, and S. Suryani, “Need Analysis for Teacher Performance Evaluation: Systematic Literature Review,” J. Tarbiyatuna, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 147–163, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.31603/tarbiyatuna.v14i2.9382.
[9] A. Punzalan and L. De Jesus, “Influence of Effective School Leadership on Teachers’ Performance: A Systematic Literature Review,” J. Interdiscip. Perspect., vol. 2, no. 11, 2024, doi: 10.69569/jip.2024.0522.
[10] B. Nimanthi, “Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness: Methods, Challenges and Implications,” Int. J. Educ., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 39–43, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.5121/ije.2024.12204.
[11] P. A. Calle-Quezada, R. S. Jerves-Mora, and M. F. Barragán-Landy, “Modelos de evaluación del desempeño laboral: Una revisión sistemática de literatura.,” Rev. Gestión las Pers. y Tecnol., vol. 17, no. 50, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.35588/0g6zzr18.
[12] B. Yang, L. Yongkang, and W. Junjie, “Study on Improving Democratic Appraisal System of Chinese Party and Government Leaders: the 360-Degree Feedback based on Competency Model,” in Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Public Management (ICPM-2012), Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2012. doi: 10.2991/icpm.2012.35.
[13] C. L. Cormack, E. Jensen, C. O. Durham, G. Smith, and B. Dumas, “The 360-degree evaluation model: A method for assessing competency in graduate nursing students. A pilot research study,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 64, pp. 132–137, May 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.027.
[14] K. G. Rodgers and C. Manifold, “360‐degree Feedback: Possibilities for Assessment of the ACGME Core Competencies for Emergency Medicine Residents,” Acad. Emerg. Med., vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1300–1304, Nov. 2002, doi: 10.1197/aemj.9.11.1300.
[15] A. Andayani, M. Handayani, H. Hanafi, A. Mardiana, S. Prabowo, and A. H. Saputra, “The Profile of Professional, Pedagogical, Social, and Personal Competence of Elementary School Teacher Education Graduates,” J. Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 3674–3682, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2700.
[16] R. P. N. Puji and R. D. Lestari, “EVALUATING THE LEVEL OF TEACHER PERFOMANCE: PEDAGOGIC, SOCIAL AND PERSONAL COMPETENCY,” J. Pendidik. Sej. Indones., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 86, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.17977/um0330v4i1p86-97.
[17] A. Aswaruddin, “Manajemen Penilaian Kinerja Guru,” J. Adm. Educ. Manag., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 212–222, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.31539/alignment.v4i2.2567.
[18] E. Goldring et al., “Make Room Value Added,” Educ. Res., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 96–104, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.3102/0013189X15575031.
[19] M. White and B. L. Maher, “How might rubric-based observations better support teacher learning and development?,” Educ. Res., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 86–101, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1080/00131881.2024.2304542.
[20] W. E. Contreras-Higuera, F. Martínez-Olmo, M. José Rubio-Hurtado, and R. Vilà-Baños, “University Students’ Perceptions of E-Portfolios and Rubrics as Combined Assessment Tools in Education Courses,” J. Educ. Comput. Res., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 85–107, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0735633115612784.
[21] J. Njiku, “Assessing the development of mathematics teachers TPACK through an observation rubric,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 2043–2066, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11901-7.
[22] M. Taghizadeh and Z. Hasani Yourdshahi, “Integrating technology into young learners’ classes: language teachers’ perceptions,” Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn., vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 982–1006, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1618876.
[23] A. McFadden and K. E. Williams, “Teachers as evaluators: Results from a systematic literature review,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 64, p. 100830, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100830.
[24] S. H. Park and P. A. Ertmer, “Examining barriers in technology‐enhanced problem‐based learning: Using a performance support systems approach,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 631–643, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00858.x.
[25] K. Nikolopoulou and V. Gialamas, “Barriers to the integration of computers in early childhood settings: Teachers’ perceptions,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 285–301, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10639-013-9281-9.
[26] K. Nikolopoulou and V. Gialamas, “Barriers to ICT use in high schools: Greek teachers’ perceptions,” J. Comput. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 59–75, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s40692-015-0052-z.
[27] S. Walsh and S. Mann, “Doing reflective practice: a data-led way forward:,” ELT J., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 351–362, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1093/elt/ccv018.
[28] B. Bucalon et al., “Thought Leader Perspectives on the Benefits, Barriers, and Enablers for Routinely Collected Electronic Health Data to Support Professional Development: Qualitative Study,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 25, p. e40685, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.2196/40685.
[29] K. M. Santillan, “Streamlining Faculty Evaluations: A Web-Based System for Enhanced Efficiency and Data-Driven Insights,” J. Innov. Technol. Converg., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 41–48, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.69478/JITC2024v6n002a04.
[30] A. Soldatenkova, A. Calabrese, N. Levialdi Ghiron, and L. Tiburzi, “Emergency department performance assessment using administrative data: A managerial framework,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 11, p. e0293401, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293401.
[31] M. Isoré, “Teacher evaluation: Current practices in OECD countries and a literature review,” 2009.
[32] V. Faubert, “School Evaluation : Current Practices in OECD Countries and a Literature Review,” Dec. 2009. doi: 10.1787/218816547156.
[33] B. P. M. Creemers and L. Kyriakides, “Validity of Educational Indicators,” in International Encyclopedia of Education, Elsevier, 2010, pp. 193–199. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00274-8.
[34] A. S. Abrorovna, “EVALUATION CRITERIA AND INDICATIONS OF STUDENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES,” Am. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Res., vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 283–290, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.37547/ajsshr/Volume04Issue08-20.
[35] H. H. Abd Al-Khadhim, “Assessing the Relevance and Adequacy of the Performance Indicators to the School Strategic Goals and Evaluation Report in a K-12 School1,” Int. J. Transform. Bus. Manag., vol. 13, no. 02, pp. 86–99, 2023, doi: 10.37648/ijtbm.v13i02.007.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ismatu Rahmawati, Randitha Missouri, Ihwan, Syafruddin, Lukman (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
